Certification of Real Images through Calibrated Content Authentication

Authors: Sarim Hashmi, Abdelrahman Elsayed, Mohammed Talha Alam, Samuele Poppi, Nils Lukas

Published: 2026-10-05 06:36:03+00:00

AI Summary

This paper proposes a novel deepfake detection paradigm that certifies images as authentic if no known generative model can faithfully reconstruct them. The authors evaluate existing detectors, showing their declining accuracy against new generative models and vulnerability to adversarial attacks. Their method utilizes calibrated thresholds to ensure a low false positive rate, even against adaptive adversaries, and demonstrates the erosion of post-hoc verifiability as generative capabilities advance.

Abstract

Generative models can synthesize high-quality inauthentic multimedia content that is already being misused at scale. We evaluate twenty deepfake detectors against ten generators released in the last four years and find accuracy decreasing over time, from near-perfect 99.5% to 76%. Adversarial perturbations further reduce every baseline detector to below 2% accuracy, effectively inverting the detector's assigned label. We argue that this unreliability reflects a fundamental ambiguity: generators can reproduce authentic content exactly (e.g., through memorization), so content alone cannot reveal the true provenance label.For this reason, content produced by a generator must admit a faithful reconstruction by that same generator, and finding such a reconstruction makes synthetic provenance plausible and authenticity plausibly deniable.We therefore propose and evaluate a detection paradigm that outputs a calibrated prediction of whether authenticity is plausibly deniable: a faithful reconstruction by any known generator establishes plausible deniability, while calibration bounds how often content from known generators fails to be reproduced. Our evaluation shows that (i) our detector can be calibrated so that at most 1% of generated content is wrongly certified, an operating point at which most baseline detectors reach near-zero recall, including the strongest with 93% accuracy; (ii) calibrating a stricter security threshold on attacked samples preserves this bound against adaptive adversaries within the evaluated bounded-perturbation attack space, whose perturbations break every baseline, but does not cover arbitrary adversarial transformations; and (iii) post-hoc verifiability is eroding, as 1,116 of 3,000 Reddit images resist reproduction by a 2022 generator, but only 55 to 79 resist reproduction by 2024 generators.


Key findings
The proposed detector can be calibrated to certify at most 1% of generated content wrongly, a point where most baseline detectors have near-zero recall. Calibrating a stricter security threshold protects against bounded adversarial perturbations that break all baseline detectors. Post-hoc verifiability is eroding, with significantly fewer Reddit images resisting reproduction by newer (2024) generators compared to older (2022) ones.
Approach
The proposed method inverts a suspect image using known generative models and measures the fidelity of the best reconstruction. If a faithful reconstruction is found by any known generator, authenticity is deemed plausibly deniable, and the detector abstains. If no generator can faithfully reconstruct the image, it is certified as authentic. This process uses a combined authenticity score from multiple similarity metrics and is calibrated with both safety and stricter security thresholds to control the false positive rate against normal and adversarial users.
Datasets
De-Factify 4, Reddit images, Deepfake-Eval-2024
Model(s)
Stable Diffusion 2.1, SD3 Medium, SD3.5 Medium, FLUX.1 Dev, FLUX.1 Dev with Realism LoRA, RF-Inversion, BLIP-2
Author countries
UAE