Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting
Authors: Marco Schreyer, Timur Sattarov, Bernd Reimer, Damian Borth
Published: 2019-10-09 06:44:23+00:00
Comment: 17 pages, 10 figures, and, 5 tables
AI Summary
This paper investigates the potential misuse of deep learning techniques, specifically deepfakes, in the finance and accounting domain by attacking Computer Assisted Audit Techniques (CAATs). The authors introduce a threat model for camouflaging accounting anomalies and demonstrate that adversarial autoencoder neural networks can learn interpretable generative factors of journal entries. This learned model is then used to generate robust 'adversarial' journal entries designed to mislead CAATs.
Abstract
Nowadays, organizations collect vast quantities of accounting relevant transactions, referred to as 'journal entries', in 'Enterprise Resource Planning' (ERP) systems. The aggregation of those entries ultimately defines an organization's financial statement. To detect potential misstatements and fraud, international audit standards demand auditors to directly assess journal entries using 'Computer Assisted AuditTechniques' (CAATs). At the same time, discoveries in deep learning research revealed that machine learning models are vulnerable to 'adversarial attacks'. It also became evident that such attack techniques can be misused to generate 'Deepfakes' designed to directly attack the perception of humans by creating convincingly altered media content. The research of such developments and their potential impact on the finance and accounting domain is still in its early stage. We believe that it is of vital relevance to investigate how such techniques could be maliciously misused in this sphere. In this work, we show an adversarial attack against CAATs using deep neural networks. We first introduce a real-world 'thread model' designed to camouflage accounting anomalies such as fraudulent journal entries. Second, we show that adversarial autoencoder neural networks are capable of learning a human interpretable model of journal entries that disentangles the entries latent generative factors. Finally, we demonstrate how such a model can be maliciously misused by a perpetrator to generate robust 'adversarial' journal entries that mislead CAATs.